The United Nations

The United Nations of the World

For those who know me, they know it is a rare occurrence for me to be rendered speechless. But when I heard that the United Nations wants to concoct a version of reality that fully contradicts real life, I must say that speechless I was. Before examining the present situation, however, it is important that I act honorably. Don't be fooled: The fact of the matter is that The U.N. attributes the most distorted, bizarre, and ludicrous "meanings" to ordinary personality characteristics. For example, if you're shy, it calls you "fearful and withdrawn". If, instead, you're the outgoing and active type, The U.N. says you're "acting out due to trauma". Why does it say such things? I've never really gotten a clear and honest answer to that question from The U.N.. But what is clear is that it may unwittingly perpetuate the nonsense known technically as the analytic/synthetic dichotomy. I say "unwittingly" because it is apparently unaware that it operates under the influence of a particular ideology—a set of beliefs based on the root metaphor of the transmission of forces.

Until you understand this root metaphor you won't be able to grasp why the biggest difference between me and the United Nations is that the U.N. wants to suppress controversy and debate! I, on the other hand, want to extirpate demagogism root, trunk, and branch.

Since I have promised to be candid, I will tell you candidly that for the time being, this is not a major issue. Whatever weight we accord to that fact, we may be confident that I wouldn't judge The U.N.'s devotees too harshly. They're indubitably just cannon fodder for the U.N.'s plot to lay all of society open to the predations of organized criminality. The United Nations' conclusions are just a rhetorical ploy to get away from the obvious fact that I would never take a job working for the U.N.. Given its supercilious smears, who would want to? The U.N.'s intent is to prevent us from asking questions. It doesn't want the details checked. It doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts it presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of its "facts" are false.

I enjoy the great diversity of humankind, in our food, our dress, our music, our literature, and our forms of spiritual expression. What I don't enjoy are the U.N.'s manipulative comments, which bring about a wonderland of conformism. The U.N. has also written volumes about how mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that it can't attack my ideas, so it attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. The United Nations could twist the history, sociology, and anthropology disseminated by our mass media and in our children's textbooks. The essence of lying is in deception, not in words. And that's the honest truth.

Most Read:

Tags: Congress, Corruption, Government, Other